Authors: Durham, C; Falmagne, V; Caron, M-E; Pyy, A; Brändle, R

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_35

Cite As:
Durham, C, Falmagne, V, Caron, M-E, Pyy, A & Brändle, R 2024, 'Investigating energy dissipation and deformation capacity of ground support schemes under dynamic loading: results from LaRonde and Kittilä mines’ drop test program', in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 589-606, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_35

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Over the past decade, mining-induced seismicity and the consequences of dynamic loading on ground support schemes have become a focus of ground control management and one of the major challenges at LaRonde mine, as it extends below 3,000 m. The Kittilä mine manages high deformation in some areas and is experiencing dynamic conditions at depth. In some rare occurrences, dynamic loading from seismic events have exceeded the capacity of ground support schemes at both sites. Furthermore, the ground control practices implemented to safely manage seismic conditions in development drives have been largely successful, but introduce operational efficiency and cost challenges. Thus as the mines progress deeper there is a need to implement ground support schemes that are not only tougher but also more efficient to install, considering current practices and available equipment at each operation. In line with a process of continuous improvement, a dynamic drop testing program was initiated at Geobrugg’s facility in Walenstadt, Switzerland, in collaboration with Geobrugg, LaRonde and Kittilä mines, to study the performance of various ground support schemes for both sites. This paper details the experimental program and the results of tests with a comparative analysis of the tested schemes. This large-scale laboratory testing program and the detailed analysis process of the conducted drop tests enable better understanding of the dynamic behaviour of different configurations of ground support schemes using the products currently employed at both mines, and help to identify possible avenues for improving the ground support scheme. The testing program is intended to guide improvements in the design of ground support schemes for deep mining conditions.

Keywords: deep mining, seismicity, dynamic ground support schemes, dynamic testing, rockburst, high stress

References:
Brändle, R & Luis Fonseca, R 2019, ‘Dynamic testing of surface support systems’, in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 243–250,
Brändle, R, Rorem, E, Luis, R & Fischer, G 2017, ‘Full-scale dynamic tests of a ground support system using high-tensile strength chain-link mesh in El Teniente mine, Chile’, in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), UMT 2017: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Underground Mining Technology, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 25–43,
Doucet, C & Voyzelle, B 2012, technical information data sheets, CanmetMINING, Ottawa.
Durham, C, Falmagne, V, Caron, M-E & Brändle, R 2024, ‘Experimental assessment of the energy dissipation and deformation capacity of ground support systems under dynamic loading: insights from LaRonde mine dynamic drop test program’, Proceedings of the 58th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium.
Epiroc 2024, PAR1 Resin Bolt, viewed 25 April 2024,
Geobrugg 2013, G-Plate GS-8079—Untertage Krallplatte USP 15/40 fur G80- Drawing Sheet.
Kaiser, PK, McCreath, DR, Brummer, RK, Maloney, S, Vasak, P & Xiaoping, Y 1996, Canadian Rockburst Support Handbook, Geomechanics Research Center, Sudbury.
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2022, ‘Influence of testing configuration on the performance of paddled energy-absorbing rockbolts under impact loading’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 5705–5721,
Normet 2024, Normet D-Bolt®—Dynamic Bolt, viewed 17 May 2024,
Ortlepp, WD & Stacey, TR 1994, ‘Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–65,
Potvin, Y & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2020, Ground Support for underground mines, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth.
Roth, A, Cala, M, Brändle, R & Rorem, E 2014, ‘Analysis and numerical modelling of dynamic ground support based on instrumented full-scale tests’, in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2014: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 151–163,
10.36487/ACG_rep/1410_08_Roth
Sasseville, G, Turcotte, P & Falmagne, V 2022, ‘Control measures to manage seismic risk at the LaRonde mine, a deep and seismically active operation’, Proceedings of the 56th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria,
Vallejos, JA, Marambio, E, Marulanda, Y, Burgos, L & Gonzalez, C 2019, ‘Progress in the numerical modelling of dynamic testing for reinforcement and retaining elements used in underground excavations’, in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 357–374,
1925_24_Marambio
Villaescusa, E, Thompson, AG, Windsor, CR & Player, JR 2023, Ground Support Technology for Highly Stressed Excavations: Integrated Theoretical, Laboratory, and Field Research, CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Windsor, CR & Thompson, AG 1992, ‘Reinforcement design for jointed rock masses’, The 33rd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au