Integrating gravitational flow and geomechanical analysis to the MBS05 of the Chuquicamata underground mine

Authors: Hormazabal, E; Barindelli, G; Montiel, E; Rojas, B; Blondel, M

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_48

Cite As:
Hormazabal, E, Barindelli, G, Montiel, E, Rojas, B & Blondel, M 2024, 'Integrating gravitational flow and geomechanical analysis to the MBS05 of the Chuquicamata underground mine', in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, pp. 767-778, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_48

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
In the practice of the geomechanical design of the extraction level of block caving mines, the spacing of drawpoints and production drifts is critical for life of mine footprint stability, gravitational flow, interaction of draw zone and reserve assumptions. This paper consolidates the results of the geotechnical and gravitational flow evaluation carried out for the Macroblock S5 (MBS05) of the Chuquicamata underground mine (MCHS) to optimise its current design. In particular, four designs corresponding to the El Teniente layout with dimensions of 15 × 22 m (15 m along production drifts and 22 m between drawbells drifts), 15 × 24 m (15 m along production drifts and 24 m between drawbells drifts) and with variants of crown pillar of 20 and 22 m in height for each case have been analysed. Gravitational flow studies were carried out with empirical methods and through simulations using Geovia PCBC software. The marker mixing (MMIX) algorithm was also used, which allows for modelling and for the simulation of various forms of mixing during ore extraction. The performance of each design was analysed considering an approach based on local numerical models through the integration of a high-resolution mesh generator and the finite difference program FLAC3D. From the analyses carried out, design options were studied in terms of Factor of Safety and stress-strain response to the application of increasing loads on the pillars compared to the alternative designs. The selected design option was evaluated with an overall scale model incorporating the geotechnical model, geological faults, and excavation sequence of surface mining. As part of this study, complex three-dimensional continuum models were developed and applied to evaluate the influence of the previously mentioned variables in the mechanical response of the underground workings, particularly, related to abutment stress developed in critical areas such as pillars and drawbells. This paper describes general and particular aspects of the MBS05, concentrating mainly on the rock mass behaviour of the operative MBs, using three-dimensional modelling.

Keywords: numerical modelling, gravitational flow, extraction level design

References:
Carranza-Torres, C & Fairhurst, C 2000a, ‘Some consequences of inelastic rock mass deformation on the tunnel support loads predicted by the Einstein and Schwartz approach’, in JF Labuz, SD Glaser & E Dawson (eds), Trends in Rock Mechanics, American Society of Civil Engineers, Colorado, pp. 16–49.
Carranza-Torres, C & Fairhurst, C 2000b, ‘Application of the convergence-confinement method of tunnel design to rock-masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 187–213.
Carranza-Torres, C & Fairhurst, C 2000c, ‘Analysis of tunnel support requirements using the Convergence-Confinement method and the Hoek–Brown rock failure criterion’, Proceedings of GeoEng2000, An International Conference on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc, Melbourne.
Castro, R 2007, Study of the Mechanisms of Gravity Flow for Block Caving, PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Castro, R, Gomez, RE, & Pérez, A 2022, ‘Physical modelling as a tool to improve our understanding of mechanics of cave flow’,
in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1071–1088,
Codelco División Chuquicamata 2021, ‘Reglas del Caving, Mina Chuquicamata Subterranea’ (Caving Rules, Chuquicamata Underground Mine), Informe GRMD-SGO-INF-007-2021.
Codelco División Chuquicamata 2023, ‘Caracterización Geotécnica Macrobloque S05 Primer Nivel de Explotación Mina Chuquicamata Subterránea’ (Geotechnical Characterization of Macroblock S05 First Mining Level Chuquicamata Underground Mine), Informe GRMD-SEG-INF-022-2023.
Hoek, E 1999, ‘Support for very weak rock associated with faults and shear zones’, in E Villaescusa, CR Windsor & AG Thompson (eds), Rock Support and Reinforcement Practice in Mining, Rotterdam, Balkema, pp. 19–32.
Hoek, E & Brown, E 2019, ‘The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI 2018 edition’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 445–463.
ITASCA 2012, FLAC3D, version 5.01.154.44151, computer software, Minneapolis.
ITASCA 2020, Griddle (TM), version 2.00.12, computer software, Minneapolis.
Janelid, I & Kvapil, R 1965, ‘Sublevel caving’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 129–153.
Just, GD 1981, ‘The significance of material flow in mine design and production’, in DR Stewart (ed.), Design and Operation of Caving and Sublevel Stoping Mines, Society of Mining Engineers, New York, pp. 715–728.
Kvapil, R 1965, ‘Gravity flow of granular materials in hoppers and bins’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 35–41.
Kvapil, R 1992, ‘Sublevel caving’, in HL Hartman (ed), SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 2nd Edition, Society for Mining Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton, pp. 1789–1814.
Kvapil, R 1998, ‘The mechanics and design of sublevel caving systems’, in RE Gertsch & RL Bullock (eds), Techniques in Underground Mining – Selections from Underground Mining Methods Handbook, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Englewood, pp. 621–653.
Kvapil, R 2004, ‘Gravity flow in sublevel and panel caving - a common sense approach’, Luleå University of Technology Press, Luleå.
Laubscher, DH 1990, ‘Mine design: a geomechanics classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining & Metallurgy, vol. 10, pp. 257–272.
Laubscher, DH 1994, ‘Cave mining: the state of the art’, The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 279–291.
Laubscher, DH 2001, ‘Cave mining – the state of the art’, in W Hustrulid & R Bullock (eds), Underground Mining Methods: Engineering Fundamentals and International Case Histories, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton, pp. 455–463.
Laubscher, D & Jakubec, J 2001, ‘The MRMR rock mass classification for jointed rock masses’, in W Hustrulid & R Bullock (eds), Underground Mining Methods: Engineering Fundamentals and International Case Histories, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Littleton, pp. 475–481.
Laubscher, DH, Guest, A & Jakubec, J 2017, Guidelines on Caving Mining Methods - The Underlying Concepts, WH Bryan Mining & Geology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
Montiel, E, Jelicic, V, Trujillo, E, Hormazabal, E & Cabrera, J 2023a, ‘Ground support assessment for a large crusher chamber’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Ground Support 2023: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 255–268,
Montiel, E, Blondel, M, Bustamante, E & Hormazábal, E 2023b, ‘Effect of blast damage on pillars of caving mines’, in W Schubert & A Kluckner (eds), Challenges in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering: Proceedings of the 15th International ISRM Congress, Austrian Society for Geomechanics, Salzburg.
Pardo, C 2015, Back Analysis of Intensive Rock Mass Damage at the El Teniente Mine, PhD thesis, Curtin University.
Richardson, MP 1981, ‘Area of draw influence and drawpoint spacing for block caving mines’, DR Stewart (ed.), Design and Operation of Caving and Sublevel Stoping Mines, Society of Mining Engineers, New York, pp. 149–156.
Rustan, A 2000, ‘Gravity flow of broken rock — what is known and unknown’, in G Chitombo (ed.), Proceedings of MassMin 2000, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 557–567.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au