DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/711_1
		  
		  
		  
		  Cite As:
		  James, JV, Rangasamy, T & Petho, SP 2007, 'Excess Shear Stress Analysis of Seimicity Associated with Dykes', in Y Potvin (ed.), 
Deep Mining 2007: Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 21-30, 
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/711_1	
		  	
		  
		  
		  
		  
    
          
		  
		  
		  Abstract:
		  
		  
		  
		  The design for mining the South Deep wide reef orebody was evolved from 1990 to 1997. When the regional 
stability pillars were laid out it was decided that to minimise loss of ore the Gemsbokfontein no. 2 dyke was 
included as the core of a 50 m wide pillar encasing the 25 m wide dyke. The dyke pillar was investigated 
using both elastic and inelastic numerical modelling. Assessment of the size of the modelled ESS lobes 
during the various stages of mining, led to the conclusion that a maximum magnitude seismic event up to 2.9 
could have been expected on the dyke. This was only anticipated toward the end of mining.  
Mining has subsequently occurred with the pillar left as designed. In July 2005 a 2.9 magnitude seismic 
event occurred on the dyke where it intersects another small dyke. Six seismic events with local magnitudes 
greater than 2 were measured in the pillar area over a 2.5 year period up to 2006. The distribution of 
seismic events indicates that major events were related to 2 smaller dykes intersecting the pillar. 
A re-evaluation of the excess shear stress (ESS) on the planes of the three dykes was undertaken to assess the 
potential seismic risk. 
The correlation between the maximum expected magnitude assessed from ESS modelling and actual 
magnitudes was remarkably good and also confirmed the original work completed in 1996. 
The use of Boundary Element codes in predicting seismicity by ESS determination is remarkably accurate 
considering the simplicity of the codes. 
On going modelling of this nature would be a useful tool for designing mining sequence and layout to 
ameliorate seismic activity and avoid working in seismically active mines. 
During a period of more than a decade the use of ESS studies with elastic modelling to anticipate the 
location, timing and magnitude of seismicity has been successfully demonstrated at the South Deep Mine. 
This research showed that the seismicity experienced could be anticipated and that mine design can be 
modified to avoid seismic risk. 
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
References:
		  	
			  Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) (2000) MinSim 2000 (
.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (1992) FLAC2D: Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua. FLAC, 3.2 Users Manual. Itasca
		  	
			  Consulting Group, Inc.
		  	
			  James, J.V. (1998) Geotechnical influences upon the design and operation of a deeplevelwide orebody gold mine. PhD
		  	
			  thesis submitted to the University of Wales, College of Cardiff.
		  	
			  McGarr, A. and Weibols, G.A. (1977) Influence of mine geometry and closure volume on seismicity in a deep level
		  	
			  mine. International Journal of Rock Mechanics Mining Science and Geomechanics, Abstracts Vol. 14.
		  	
			  Mining Stress Systems (1997) Users guide for BESOL/MINAP_97 for Windows:Minining Applications for Boundary
		  	
			  Element Methods, Version 1.00. Mining Stress Systems (Pty) Ltd. Johannesburg
		  	
			  Ryder, J.A. (1988) Excess shear stress in the assessment of geologically hazardous situations. Journal of South African
		  	
			  Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 88 (1), pp. 27-39.
		  	
			  Salamon, M.D.G. (1984) Energy considerations in rock mechanics; fundamental results. Journal of South African
		  	
			  Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 78 (1), pp. 27-39.
		  	
			  Excess Shear Stress Analysis of Seismicity Associated With Dykes J.V. James, et al.
		  	
			  30 Deep Mining 07, Perth, Australia