Geotechnical Modelling for Kimberlite Pipes

Authors: Tyler, DB; Godden, SJ

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/808_159

Cite As:
Tyler, DB & Godden, SJ 2008, 'Geotechnical Modelling for Kimberlite Pipes', in Y Potvin, J Carter, A Dyskin & R Jeffrey (eds), SHIRMS 2008: Proceedings of the First Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 551-564, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/808_159

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
EKATI Diamond Mine is located some 200 km south of the Arctic Circle and 300 km northeast of Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories of Canada. It is a remote fly-in-fly-out site with road access limited to the winter ice road season. The operation currently consists of two active open pits and two underground operations. Feed from the underground mines comprises high-grade material that is vital to the ongoing success of the EKATI operation. During the Koala Sublevel Caving feasibility study, indicative kriging was used as part of the geotechnical characterisation and modelling process, to aid in the assessment of kimberlite ground conditions, rock mass caveability and ground control requirements. This paper discusses the rational behind key areas of the rock mass characterisation program and how the geotechnical models were developed and verified.

References:
Bieniawski, Z.T. (1976) Rock Mass Classification in Rock Engineering. Exploration for Rock Engineering, Z.T. Bieniawski (editor), Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam.
EKATI Diamond Mine (2006) Koala Underground Project, Section 5.1, Feasibility Study June 2006, Technical Report to BHP Billiton Corporate.
Godden, S. (2005) Geotechnical Investigation, Koala Underground Feasibility Study, EKATI Diamond Mines, NWT, Canada, S. Godden and Associates Ltd, consultancy report to BHP Billiton Diamonds’ EKATI Mine, November.
Godden, S. (2006) Kimberlite Performance Appraisals, Drift Support Design and Wet Muck Flow Potential, Koala Underground Feasibility Study, EKATI Diamond Mines, NWT, Canada, S. Godden and Associates Ltd consultancy report to BHP Billiton Diamonds’ EKATI mine, February.
Goodman, R.E. (1989) Introduction to Rock Mechanics, 2nd Edition Publisher, John Wiley and Sons.
Hoek, E. (1990) Estimating Mohr–Coulomb Friction and Cohesion Values from the Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion, International Journal Rock Mechanics, Mining, Science and Geomechics Abstracts, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 227–229.
Hoek, E., Carranza–Torres, C. and Corkum, B. (2002) Hoek–Brown Criterion – 2002 Edition, Proceedings NARMS–TAC Conference, Toronto, 1, pp. 267–273.
Obert, L. and Duvall, W.I. (1967) Rock Mechanics and the Design of Structures in Rock, Pub. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
ROCKDATA (1991) A Computer Program to Analyze Laboratory Strength Data, Rock Engineering Group, University of Toronto, Version 2.2.
Rocscience (2002) ROCLAB – Rock Mass Strength Analysis using the Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion, User’s Guide.
Shah, S. and Hoek, E. (1992) Simplex Reflection Analysis of Laboratory Strength Data to Obtain Hoek–Brown Parameters, Canadian Geotech. Journal.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au